Only a small proportion of respondents in any age group say they use
‘emergent technology’ (e.g. Web 2.0 applications) in their research, although
those that do generally find it valuable.
A Case for Mindful Browsing | Peer to Peer Review - 0 views
The Internet Is A-Changing and We Need To Adapt | From the Bell Tower - 0 views
Extreme Presentation Method - 0 views
Build Your Own Instructional Literacy | American Libraries Magazine - 1 views
Information Literacy and Learning - Stephen's Lighthouse - 0 views
Seven qualities of highly effective technology trainers - 0 views
Information Literacy meets Library 2.0: Researchers of Tomorrow (who use Google) - 0 views
-
Summary of summary report about IL habits of Gen Y
Richard Byrne's Beyond Google: Improve Your Search Results - NeverEndingSearch - Blog o... - 1 views
-
Techniques for improving search results
10 ways library schools should be teaching social media - 1 views
-
So often I come across library websites that have blogs and even Twitter feeds, but don’t integrate the content into the page thereby forcing users to add another click to see the content.
-
Meebo is common and easy enough to figure out on one’s own, perhaps, but what about the many other channels through which reference could take place? Skype, for instance? If one of the challenges of the virtual reference interview is missing out on non-verbal cues from patrons, then what is stopping the library from implementing webcam reference?
-
By providing social media tools and the opportunity for your users to provide commentary and feedback on library programming and services–especially if those comments are acknowledged or even acted upon–is an easy and unbelievably effective way to increase appreciation and support for your organization.
- ...1 more annotation...
Information Literacy meets Library 2.0: More student views on searching - 1 views
Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education - 0 views
-
Peer reviewed open access journal
